Editors Choice

Your Next Mammogram Could Be a Game Changer: AI Sees What We Miss

Envision a future where mammograms, with the aid of AI, become even more effective at detecting breast cancer. This advancement not only enhances the accuracy of diagnoses but also alleviates unnecessary stress and anxiety from false positives, offering a sense of reassurance to women.

New research findings suggest that the future might be closer than you think.

I am an oncologist with a special interest in breast cancer.

I am watching closely as artificial intelligence infiltrates many aspects of the field.

That future might be closer than you think.

Photo by Xu Haiwei on Unsplash

AI and Breast Cancer Screening

A new study published in Radiology, a journal of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), suggests artificial intelligence (AI) could be the game-changer we’ve been waiting for.

In this groundbreaking study, Danish researchers harnessed the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze mammograms, yielding promising results:

Not only did AI find more breast cancers, but it also significantly reduced the rate of false positives.

Using this approach could mean fewer unnecessary biopsies and a lot more peace of mind for women undergoing breast cancer screening.

Let’s delve deeper into this exciting development and explore how AI might revolutionize the fight against breast cancer.

Study Details: AI and Breast Cancer Screening

The Danish study involved two groups of women aged 50 to 69 who received mammograms every two years.

Before AI

The first group had their mammograms read by two radiologists traditionally.

Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash

Enter AI

The second group’s mammograms were first analyzed by AI software trained to spot suspicious areas.

If the AI flagged a mammogram as likely normal, a single radiologist reviewed it.

Any mammograms raising concerns with the AI received a double read by radiologists with AI support.

Promising Results

Here are the study findings:

The artificial intelligence detected more breast cancers (0.82 percent) than the traditional method (0.70 percent). AI identified a higher percentage of smaller (under one centimeter) invasive cancers.

Notably, the AI approach significantly reduced false positives (1.6 percent) compared to the traditional method (2.4 percent), offering women a greater sense of reassurance.

Ultrasounded-guided breast biopsy. Adobe Stock Photos.

The reduction in false positive results means fewer women undergoing unnecessary biopsies and worrying about potential cancer.

The AI system also helped radiologists by lowering their workload by one-third.

What’s Next?

While these results are exciting, more research is needed to ensure long-term effectiveness and avoid unnecessary diagnoses.

The AI system is also under development, and researchers are working on incorporating a woman’s past mammogram history for a more complete picture.

Important Note

Breast cancer screening guidelines can vary between countries.

Researchers conducted the study in Denmark, and the findings might not directly translate to other regions with different protocols.

Summary

This study showed that using AI alongside mammograms led to:

  • Discovering more cancers: The AI system helped find a slightly higher percentage of breast cancers than traditional methods.
  • Fewer false alarms: Women had a lower chance of being called back for unnecessary biopsies due to suspicious results that weren’t cancer.
  • Lighter workload for doctors: The AI system helped radiologists work more efficiently by highlighting areas of concern.

While these initial findings are promising, it’s crucial to note that more studies are needed to confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of AI-assisted screening.

This emphasis on ongoing research keeps the audience informed and aware of the evolving nature of healthcare practices.
As someone who helps those with breast cancer, I am excited.

As someone who helps those with breast cancer, I am excited.

Michael Hunter, MD

I received an undergraduate degree from Harvard, a medical degree from Yale, and trained in radiation oncology at the University of Pennsylvania. I practice radiation oncology in the Seattle area.

Recent Posts

Monday, Monday, Anxiety Strikes and Sticks for a Lifetime

You know that sinking feeling when Sunday evening rolls around and you think about the…

19 hours ago

Science Has No Borders – And Neither Should Human Potential

Here at the HIMSS AI in Healthcare Forum, held in Brooklyn—long a gateway for immigration…

3 days ago

The Stroke That Stole My Father And the Tiny Device That Could Stop the Next One

It happened without warning. My father collapsed at home, his face slack, his words gone.…

3 days ago

Why AI’s Future in the Health Sector Hinges on Leadership, Not Just Technology

The room was standing room only. At the HIMSS AI in Healthcare Forum, the energy…

4 days ago

Pandora’s Ghost: The Seduction of Artificial Perfection

We didn’t open the box out of malice. We opened it because we were curious.…

4 days ago

Can Doctors “Gaslight” Their Patients?

I was taken aback by the term used in the article published in JAMA Network…

5 days ago

This website uses cookies. Your continued use of the site is subject to the acceptance of these cookies. Please refer to our Privacy Policy for more information.

Read More