Coronavirus

Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 May Only Last 2–3 Months, Study Says

A big question on the minds of clinicians and researchers alike is how long does immunity against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID 19, last? Is it life-long? Is it a few months? If you get it once, does it mean that you can never get it again?

We still don’t know.

Enter this important study published in Nature Medicine. Researchers from China studied 37 asymptomatic individuals in the Wanzhou District who were diagnosed with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections but had no relevant clinical symptoms in the preceding 14 days and during hospitalization.

They found that IgG levels and neutralizing antibodies — the antibodies that are much longer-lasting and are protective against further infection — started to decrease within 2–3 months after infection. 40% of patients with asymptomatic infection had no antibodies detected within 8 weeks of the initial infection. And, it seemed that those who had no symptoms had a weaker immune response to the virus.

On the one hand, this makes some sense. If you didn’t develop any symptoms, your immune response may not have been as robust as someone else who had a fever, chills, body aches, and other symptoms. Many of those symptoms are as a result of the immune response to the virus itself.

On the other hand, just because it seemed that those patients who had an asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 had decreased antibodies after 2–3 months, it does not mean that they will get the virus again and again and again. This is because of the nature of the adaptive immune response to infection.

Source: OpenStax College / CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)

When we first get an infection — any infection — we develop an initial immune response with antibodies called IgM. Then, later, the body develops IgG antibodies, which more protective and longer-lasting. When we take vaccines, we are coaxing the immune system to develop those IgG antibodies.

Some immune responses, like that to Measles or the Measles vaccine, are life-long. Others, like that to influenza, do not last our entire lives. We still don’t know exactly what kind of immune response is generated to SARS-CoV-2. Still, even if the initial immune response doesn’t last very long, the body usually keeps a memory of the previous infection. And so, if and when we get infected with SARS-CoV-2 again, the body’s immune system should remember the previous infection, and it should develop a very robust secondary immune response.

The key word is “should.” If the virus mutates, then all bets are off, as the body has not seen this new mutated version of the virus. Further, what this study does not answer — and it cannot answer unless researchers deliberately infect these individuals with SARS-CoV-2 — is if these individuals with asymptomatic infection become symptomatic if re-exposed to the same virus again.

Still, the implications of this research are significant.

If immunity doesn’t last very long, then having antibodies doesn’t mean we are free to disregard social distancing requirements. And, if a vaccine is developed, perhaps it may need to be taken every year — like the influenza vaccine — and not once in our lifetimes, like the measles vaccine.

In addition, if it is true that 40% of individuals who had asymptomatic infection don’t have detectable antibodies 8 weeks after infection, if they test negative for the antibodies, it does not mean that they never had Covid-19.

This will make it harder to determine the true extent of viral infection in the community.

As I have written before, this virus and the infection it causes is so new, there is so much that we don’t know. Every bit of information adds to the larger body of evidence.

True, there is so much out there that it is overwhelming at times. That said, it is still important to gather that information. This is because, the more we know, the better equipped we will be to fight this horrible scourge.

Dr. Hesham A. Hassaballa

Dr. Hesham A. Hassaballa is a NY Times featured Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine specialist in clinical practice for over 20 years. He is Board Certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, and Sleep Medicine. He is a prolific writer, with dozens of peer-reviewed scientific articles and medical blog posts. He is a Physician Leader and published author. His latest book is "Code Blue," a medical thriller.

Recent Posts

The Invisible Lifeline: Why Supplies, Not Just Science, Determine Patient Care

In the health system, news coverage naturally gravitates toward breakthroughs. A new therapy, a diagnostic…

4 days ago

Nature as Infrastructure: Why the Urban Tree Is an Investable Asset

I first learned about the urban heat island effect in a high school geography class.…

7 days ago

From AI Excitement to Execution: Why Health Leaders Must Now Master the “How”

Artificial intelligence is advancing in health care faster than almost any other technology in modern…

3 weeks ago

The Shift from Pure Modernity to Human-Centered Modernity

Throughout the history of science, it has rarely been the case that any phenomenon has…

3 weeks ago

We Have to Earn Better Vaccine Coverage Rates

Mandates and strong recommendations have been the key to successful vaccination programmes protecting people for…

3 weeks ago

Brain Organoids: Promise, Limits, and What Comes Next

Brain organoids, sometimes called “mini-brains,” are three-dimensional clusters of human brain cells grown in labs from pluripotent stem…

3 weeks ago

This website uses cookies. Your continued use of the site is subject to the acceptance of these cookies. Please refer to our Privacy Policy for more information.

Read More