We are a species enamored with technology. I count myself among the early adopters who eagerly embraced gadgets promising to reshape how we live and heal. I owned an Apple Newton decades before smartphones became second nature. I strapped on a Fitbit long before step-counting became a cultural norm. I’ve carried an AliveCor device to track my heart rhythm because I care about heart health.

I’m fascinated by AI and impressed by the capabilities of ChatGPT and other large language models. But through all of it, a pattern emerges: while we sprint forward with healthtech innovation, we often overlook the element that gives health its soul—human empathy.

Hollywood’s visions of the future play out that tension. Films like iRobot and Outside the Wire imagine a world where advanced technology surrounds humans. Yet even in these hyper-connected futures, the human spirit, judgment and emotional resonance triumph over computation. Tech may win the movie battle, but empathy wins humanity’s greatest challenges.

So, the question becomes: in our real love affair with technology, how do we ensure that it doesn’t diminish our humanity but enhances it?

Digital Health’s Expanding Horizon

Health delivery is at a crossroads. On one hand, we are real-time participants in a sea-changing Cambrian explosion of innovation—AI models reading radiology scans, wearable devices transmitting real-time health data from patient to provider, voice assistants aiding mental health, AI tools “scraping” data from EMRs and predictive algorithms alerting physicians to early signs of disease. On the other hand, the average patient still struggles to schedule an appointment, reach a care coordinator, navigate their health insurance coverage or feel heard during a clinical encounter.

Digital health evolves faster than we can emotionally and ethically integrate into the care journey. As Hal Wolf, CEO of global NGO HIMSS, said in a 2025 HIMSS Europe keynote, “Old Organization + New Technology = Expensive Old Organization.” The implication is clear: technology alone is not transformation. It is a tool that is only as effective as the system and the people who apply it with purpose.

The Role of Emotion in Healing

John Nosta, a leading innovation theorist and founder of NostaLab, explores health decisions’ emotional and cognitive complexity in his essay Unraveling the Human Mind. He highlights the importance of understanding emotions like joy, guilt, and envy in AI development, reminding us that behavior is not driven solely by data but by deeply human emotional processes. This insight is critical: health behaviors—whether quitting smoking, taking medication, or attending a follow-up appointment—are deeply influenced by fear, hope, anxiety, trust and love.

AI can surface patterns, but it cannot feel. It can summarize a patient’s medical history, but cannot detect the tremble in their voice when they say, “I’m scared.” We must not confuse intelligence with insight or information with understanding.

Empathy as a Design Principle

For health tech to reach its most significant potential, we must design systems that understand and adapt to the human condition. That means:

Unfortunately, many current implementations miss the mark. A chatbot that dismisses a patient’s concerns with canned responses doesn’t reflect innovation—it reflects embedded institutional indifference. An app that tracks glucose but fails to create bridges to a community of support doesn’t reflect progress—it reflects a missed opportunity for connection and adherence.

The Power of AI and LLMs

Tom Lawry, former National Director for AI in Health & Life Sciences at Microsoft, captures this idea succinctly: “AI can automate highly repetitive activities and augment activities that are more highly varied and require a higher level of problem solving.” This duality reflects the essence of digital health transformation—technology that supports human expertise, not replaces it.

When used with intention, large language models like ChatGPT can democratize information, translate medical jargon, and surface unseen risks. They are powerful co-pilots in care. But they lack the capacity for compassion and their accuracy rests solely with the people designing the system.

I’ve often said that communication is the currency of care. That truth remains. The best outcomes emerge not from algorithms alone but from conversations between doctors and patients, health systems and communities, policymakers and people. Technology can facilitate these conversations, but it cannot replace them.

Leadership Needed

This is a call to the architects of our health future: More than “Don’t forget the patient, the caregiver, or the person behind the data,” people must be at the center of the action. We must remember that we are always people, only sometimes patients. Therefore, we need leaders—inside industry, government, academia and advocacy—who understand that digital transformation must be human-centered.

At the intersection of health and technology, we need humility. We need to listen more, build thoughtfully and measure success not just by the speed of a process or precision of a model, but by the quality of life it helps sustain and save.

Reimagining the Health-Tech Love Story

Our fascination with technology isn’t wrong. It’s natural. Much like the cinematic heroes in iRobot and Outside the Wire, we are drawn to machines’ capabilities but are also reminded that their greatest strengths emerge when paired with human insight. In those stories, it is not the tech that ultimately saves the day but the human instinct for empathy, ethics and engagement.

Progress is essential. But as we reimagine the health ecosystem, we must write a new love story—one where technology and empathy are co-stars, not competitors. One where innovation is in service of intimacy, and the promise of AI is fulfilled not in clinical outputs, but in human outcomes.

As someone who has watched health tech innovation unfold through the decades—from Apple Newton to neural networks—I remain hopeful. But hope, like health, is a human trait. It can’t be programmed. It must be lived.

Let’s remember that healing is not just about fixing bodies. It’s about touching hearts. Let’s code for that.

The post Human First: Reclaiming Empathy in Our Love Affair with Health Tech appeared first on Medika Life.

He is a second-generation physician who prefers to be called by his first name, honoring his father, “the original Dr. Grossmann.”  In his own right, he’s a trailblazer at the nexus of surgical care and innovation. Born in Caracas, Venezuela and carrying forward his family’s medical legacy, he completed his surgical residency in Ann Arbor, Michigan, before establishing his practice in New England, serving as a general, trauma, advanced laparoscopic, and robotic surgeon at Portsmouth Regional Hospital in New Hampshire and Eastern Maine Medical Center.

Rafael is frequently linked to his groundbreaking use of Google Glass during surgery. But to define him by that singular innovation is to miss the deeper force driving his work: an unwavering belief that technology must serve—not supplant—the doctor–patient relationship. In recent interviews and longstanding contributions across digital health platforms, Rafael shares an increasingly urgent message: humility and empathy are not soft skills of the past—they are foundational elements of the future.

Proximity Over Performance
Rafael’s approach to technology is both deliberate and human-centered. He integrates AI, extended reality, and telehealth into care environments with one goal: to foster proximity between healer and patient. Whether bringing loved ones into ICU rooms through virtual tools, using augmented reality to teach medical trainees, or deploying wearables to enhance surgical insight, his purpose is consistent: technology must deepen the human connection.

“If the technology doesn’t enhance the connection between physician and patient,” Dr. Grossmann notes, “it has no role in care.”

That conviction reflects a broader truth in modern medicine: innovation must be guided by intention. The impact of a new tool is not measured by its complexity, but by its capacity to sharpen listening, expand compassion, and build trust. In this view, humility is not an abstract virtue—it is a clinical competency.

Humility as a Clinical Skill
While empathy is increasingly recognized as a measurable component of quality care, humility remains underappreciated. Yet humility—the ability to acknowledge limits, listen fully, and elevate the patient’s needs—may be one of the most critical skills a clinician can develop.

Rafael challenges medical education to do more than train for outcomes; he calls for cultivating presence. In trauma settings and academic halls alike, he models humility not as passivity, but as active, intentional leadership. It takes courage, he says, to be honest with patients—not just about diagnoses, but about uncertainty.

“The best medicine,” he reflects, “comes from presence, not only performance.” In high-tech environments where algorithms analyze and recommend, the clinician’s humility may be the most human—and healing—intervention available.

Empathy, Elevated by Innovation
To Rafael, empathy and innovation are not opposites. When used wisely, technology can extend—not replace—the clinician’s presence. Telemedicine platforms become conduits for comfort. Immersive simulations train for compassion. Data becomes dialogue when interpreted with care.

This mindset is especially important now. Patients today may have unprecedented access to information, yet they often feel unseen. In an age of instant answers, the experience of being truly heard remains rare. Rafael reminds health-sector leaders and policymakers that no system—however advanced—can succeed if it forgets the people it was designed to serve.

Clinicians stand at a crossroads as health delivery accelerates toward predictive analytics and AI-driven decisions. Technology offers an undeniable opportunity: greater access, improved accuracy, and better outcomes. But these advances must be matched by a return to the timeless principles of great medicine—empathy, humility, and presence.

Rafael’s work represents a rare blend of innovation and introspection. His willingness to explore the boundaries of digital medicine is matched by a steadfast insistence that patients remain at the center. The future of care, he contends, won’t be defined by who uses the most sophisticated technology, but by who uses it to deepen human connection.

Rafael is not focused on being remembered for the tools he introduced. He hopes to be known for something quieter: helping patients and clinicians feel seen, heard, and supported.

In an era when health systems are rethinking priorities, medical schools are reassessing competencies, and companies are racing to redefine care delivery, the voices of clinicians like Rafael’s matter more than ever. Humility, after all, is not the opposite of expertise—it is its most authentic expression.

The post “Humility” Is Cutting-Edge Medicine: What a Physician Innovator Teaches Us About Patient-Centered Care appeared first on Medika Life.

Sometimes it’s a look.

A line.

A moment that lands deeper than diagnosis.

This brief essay is a collection of those moments.

Brief.

Unexpected.

And always real.

“The Healing Power of Touch: A Patient’s Insight”

This week, a patient shared a poignant realization that emerged after years of emotional distance from his wife.

They had grown apart, but recently discovered a shared need: the simple, profound act of touch.

He reflected on how a gentle hug or a reassuring hand on the shoulder seemed to bridge the emotional gap between them.

“I think we’re wired for this,” he mused, referencing hormones like oxytocin that respond to physical affection.

His insight aligns with scientific findings.

Oxytocin, often referred to as the “love hormone,” plays a crucial role in social bonding and emotional connection.

Studies have shown that affectionate touch can increase oxytocin levels, reduce stress, and foster feelings of trust and closeness.

In fact, research indicates that even brief moments of affectionate touch can lead to measurable increases in oxytocin, a hormone that contributes to an improved mood and reduced anxiety.

This finding underscores the biological underpinnings of our need for physical connection.

My patient’s experience serves as a reminder that sometimes, healing in relationships doesn’t require grand gestures — just a touch of understanding, quite literally.

For more reflections on connection at the edge of life, read my essay: What Dying Men Confessed When No One Was Listening.

“The Prostitute’s Pasta”

In oncology, gratitude comes in many forms — thank-you notes, quiet nods, even tears.

But sometimes, it arrives as a steaming pan of pasta.

One of our patients, an older Italian gentleman with a twinkle in his eye and impeccable taste, has taken to feeding the staff.

Not metaphorically — literally.

Lasagna, tiramisu, and even delicate cannoli are dusted with sugar like freshly fallen snow.

Today, he arrived bearing a new dish. “Pasta Puttanesca!” he announced proudly. “You know — the prostitute’s pasta.”

A pause.

Then laughter. Nurses chuckled. My medical assistant nearly dropped her stethoscope.

He winked. “They say it was made quickly, between clients.”

I’ll leave the etymology to linguists.

But I can tell you this: the olives were briny, the sauce was bold, and the gratitude was unmistakable.

This event was something else entirely in a world often defined by scans and side effects.

A recipe for connection.

Served al dente.

Note: For patient privacy, I have modified some details.

Here are my previous Clinic Notes essays:

1. Clinic Notes 5/18/2025
2. Clinic Notes 6/26/2025

Want more stories like these — plus the science behind living longer and better? I’ve distilled the most powerful lessons from oncology, aging research, and patient wisdom into my new ebook: Extending Life and Healthspan.

Practical, evidence-based, and full of humanity.

The post Clinic Notes: What My Patients Said This Week appeared first on Medika Life.

When skilled medical care is guided by empathy, it becomes something greater. It rises beyond competency. It becomes a connection. It becomes care.

We celebrate survival and measurable outcomes — and we should, however, carry with us what people carry with them long after the diagnosis, such as what was done and how we were treated in the process. It is when a physician takes the time to explain the next steps clearly. It’s the kind gesture from a nurse, the smile behind the mask, the call that came just to check-in. These human elements are not extras. Communication is always part of care.

The most enduring part of the health journey is whether people survive and how they are treated while they try.

People Always, Sometimes Patients

People navigating illness rarely rave about systems. They remember moments — how a physician sat and listened, the hand on the shoulder, the honest, unhurried explanation. They speak of kindness, clarity, and dignity. Empathy is not an accessory to care — it is the essence of care. The data backs that up.

A Medscape report confirmed that patients with chronic pain experienced significant improvement when treated by physicians who exhibited empathy. In Patient Education and Counseling studies, empathy led to better communication, treatment adherence, and clinical outcomes. Harvard Medical School research shows that when patients feel heard and understood, they’re more likely to engage in their care and experience improved results. This is more than perception — it’s physiology. Stress levels drop, trust increases, and healing accelerates.

Empathy isn’t a “soft skill.” It’s a clinical tool that improves outcomes and humanizes healthcare. In How Doctors Think, Jerome Groopman, MD, reminds us that data does not replace presence: “Statistics cannot substitute for the human being before you; statistics embody averages, not individuals.” Every patient has a backstory — a unique path to the clinic door — and when physicians listen, they gain context and insight.

In 1993, the late Arnold P. Gold, MD of Columbia University, reimagined the start of a medical student’s journey by introducing the “White Coat Ceremony” — a symbol of professionalism and compassion in care. His vision was simple but profound: remind future physicians from day one that medicine is about people, not just pathology.

The ceremony expanded to nursing and other health professions under the leadership of Richard I. Levin, MD, Professor Emeritus of Medicine, Department of Medicine at NYU Langone Health and former President and CEO of The Arnold P. Gold Foundation. “We mourn for him,” Dr. Levin said of Dr. Gold, “but as we celebrate his unique life, we can all carry his legacy forward in love.” The White Coat Ceremony, born from one physician’s belief in the power of human connection, can be a learning experience shaping the heart of health professionals.

The Clinicians Who Lead with Heart

This approach is not hypothetical. It’s exemplified by physicians whose names are synonymous with excellence and empathy. These are outstanding physicians I have encountered through the years. They and their office or department teams collectively demonstrate that knowledge and empathic caring create memorable medical experiences.

Empathy is not just a soft skill in healing — it’s a clinical art. It allows a physician to step into the world of their patient and grasp their experience emotionally, intellectually, and behaviorally. However, empathy goes further: it means communicating that understanding, validating the patient’s concerns, and transforming the exchange into therapeutic action. Empathy becomes the bridge between the healer and those seeking to be healed — where listening becomes treatment, and understanding becomes care.

This fusion of clinical excellence and genuine empathy distinguishes exceptional physicians in healthcare delivery. These physicians prove that it is possible to be both an outstanding clinical physician with a heart and conscience:

A distinguished urologist in New Jersey, Joseph V. DiTrolio, MD, who only recently announced his retirement from clinical practice, seamlessly integrated innovative techniques with a patient-first philosophy for years. His approachable demeanor — insisting patients call him “Joe” — fosters a comforting environment where individuals feel genuinely valued. Beyond his clinical practice, Dr. DiTrolio has contributed significantly to urology through product development and holds several patents. His commitment to education is evident in his Clinical Professor of Surgery role at New Jersey Medical School.

Serving as President of Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital and Physician-in-Chief of The Mount Sinai Hospital, Valentin Fuster, MD, embodies the integration of empathy and leadership. His holistic approach to cardiovascular health — encompassing research, patient care, public health policy and education — has made a global impact. Dr. Fuster’s development of a cardiovascular “polypill” reflects his dedication to accessible patient care, reducing cardiovascular mortality by 33 percent among heart attack survivors. His contributions have been recognized with numerous accolades, including the World Heart Federation Lifetime Achievement Award. He makes himself 100 percent available, whether focusing on a patient in the ER awaiting treatment, rebuilding Haiti’s health system, focusing on the needs of communities in Spain, or leading a global professional association. His heart is in everything he engages.

As Chair of Radiation Oncology at Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center, Alison Grann, MD, exemplifies the harmonious blend of clinical precision and emotional intelligence. Recognizing the emotional weight of specific diagnoses, she ensures that every patient interaction — from reception to treatment — is infused with warmth and respect. Her leadership fosters an environment where patients feel seen and heard, reinforcing their trust in their care. Dr. Grann’s commitment extends beyond patient care; she actively engages in research and holds a Clinical Assistant Professorship at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey.

At Weill Cornell Medicine, Allyson J. Ocean, MD, stands out as a leading gastrointestinal oncologist and patient advocate. Her compassionate approach clarifies the uncertainties of oncology, deeply resonating with patients. As a co-founder of “Let’s Win Pancreatic Cancer,” she heeded the counsel of a communication leader – one of her patients – the late Anne Glauber – and turned the pancreatic cancer journey into a broader mission to extend others’ lives. Dr. Ocean’s dedication to patient-centered care is further demonstrated through her roles at The Jay Monahan Center for Gastrointestinal Health and her active involvement in clinical research and education.

At NYU Langone, Lawrence (Larry) Phillips, MD, delivers exceptional cardiovascular care rooted in empathy and connection. In a specialty where urgency often overtakes interaction, he slows the pace — making listening his first intervention. Patients consistently highlight how seen and heard they feel, a testament to his people-first approach. Board-certified in Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Disease, Dr. Phillips also serves at NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue and is a passionate advocate with the American Heart Association, leading grassroots efforts to expand CPR training and community heart health education.

As Chief Medical Officer of WebMD, John Whyte, MD, MPH, bridges the worlds of clinical practice, public health, and consumer education — delivering trusted health information with empathy and clarity. He sees patients weekly, grounding his clinical leadership in real-world care. Dr. Whyte’s books, including Take Control of Your Cancer Risk and Is This Normal?, reflect his commitment to guiding people through their health journeys with candor and compassion. A former leader at the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, he brings a public health lens to his work, ensuring each message empowers and every patient feels seen.

These physicians exemplify how empathy and medical expertise transform patient care and cement community admiration. They do more than heal — they restore faith in the system and dignity to the patient’s journey.

Stop Calling Us Beneficiaries — We’re Paying Customers

Empathy must extend beyond the individual clinician and become a defining trait of our health system, from how we write policies to how we answer phones.

Too often, people in need of care face frustration instead of compassion. Insurance denials, confusing bills, impersonal communications — these compound the stress of illness. But forward-thinking organizations are challenging that norm.

In the health industry, we often claim that the patient is at the center of care and that naïve Band-Aid should be ripped off. The murder of Brian Thompson is a tragic and terrifying wake-up call to the US health insurance industry. However, the headlines have receded into the background, and with the passing news cycle, so has the urgency to evolve the care coverage system.

The public reaction to Thompson’s death gives us an essential opportunity to recognize that we have lost the trust of many of the people the sector seeks to serve. The trauma of this terrible moment can be addressed in one of two ways — avoidance or engagement. This event must catalyze health companies to reassess their approach to patient care and public trust.

Profitability and service to the patient aren’t two separate outcomes. Investing in interventional care and providing that care are also inextricably intertwined. The industry should consider several key recommendations. Some companies do what is needed to treat “beneficiaries” and “members” more like paying and valued customers.

MetLife and Guardian Life have partnered with Empathy, a platform designed to support beneficiaries through bereavement. These companies understand that losing a loved one is not just a claims process; it’s a human-customer-like — experience. They’ve committed to making that moment one of guidance, not bureaucracy.

Operationally, insurance teams must rethink how they respond to prior authorization requests. What if instead of a hard “No,” a representative said, “Let’s see what we can do together”? That’s not just good service. It lowers people’s tension and is good medicine. When insurance becomes a partner, not a process, people feel seen — not shuffled.

In the broader system, patient navigation — first championed by a physician who became an authority on race, poverty, and cancer — Harold Freeman, MD — shows that outcomes improve when people have support navigating the maze of care. Especially in underserved communities, navigators ensure that empathy is not dependent on privilege. It becomes a universal right.

Designing for Dignity

Empathy isn’t just something we express; it’s something we can design. We can build it into:

• The architecture of clinics that create calm, not chaos
• The approach we take in helping patients complete registration
• The way we train AI and LLMs to converse with respect
• The tone of insurance letters that minimize legalese and empathize with care
• The workflows that give nurses and doctors more time to connect

We must think of empathy not as reactive but as proactive. It must be embedded in systems, supported by policy, and measured by efficiency and experience. Empathy differentiates between treating a condition, focusing on a body part, and healing a person.

The System’s Soul

At its best, medicine is more than what we do — it is about how we do it. Empathy does not appear on a chart and is not coded into billing. But its absence is always felt, and its presence potentially transforms the entire care experience.

Empathy binds us back to our purpose, whether we are physicians in a clinic, nurses in an ICU, call center agents helping a customer navigate issues with a denied claim, or patient navigators walking with someone through a new diagnosis.

As we move into the future of AI, automation, digital health, and remote care, our most vital technology remains human connection. Our most critical clinical protocol is compassion.

Empathy is not a soft idea. It is medicine’s soul in action.

The post Empathy and Health Excellence — The Superpower of Care Delivery appeared first on Medika Life.

Shortly before 2024 and even in early 2024, the concern of many experts and developers was how to understand about correct use of AI tools and LLMs. Along with this global concern, others thought that this fast-paced technology was a great opportunity to establish startups and invest heavily in them.

Another group, mainly social theorists and humanities experts, tried to work on this question :

“How can humans interact with GPTs”, while their concern about the importance of human-AI interaction seemed reasonable, they raised questions about the mode of interaction, the type of interaction, and the emotional variables affecting human-technology interaction.

What was and is most remarkable among all was the unprecedented speed of the emergence and evolution of large language models. This speed exceeded all the questions and challenges considered by experts, to the point that at the end of the new year and the last days of 2024, raising better and more practical questions about how to guide the human thought process and guide the human user by LLMs in the form of a dynamic coexistence.

The evolution from “assistant” “to “mentor “

Predictably, 2025 will also time for significant developments in the dimension of dynamic interaction between human and LLMs.

As you have been seeing in 2024 varieties of large language Models emerged, providing significant assistance to humans, to the point that many articles and technology experts selected the names “assistant” and “partner” to large language models. However, at the same time, these services still included pre-programmed responses. In addition, despite the efforts of various businesses in producing AI startups around the world, mainly in the United States, China Japan, and some European countries, the focus of AI tools was on healthcare, education, finance, and consumer services. So, they seldom were used in other industries.

Nevertheless, the developments at the end of 2024 the quantitative growth of LLMs on the one hand, and the expected expectations of a qualitative leap on the other hand, strengthen the prediction of more interesting developments. In other words, we can now see artificial intelligence in the context of LLMs becoming more specialized and having more dynamic interactions with humans. Going beyond the education and healthcare industry and including other industries and areas.

Instead of predetermined and specific answers, it will have more multifaceted and broader answers to human needs and questions and will be more personalized than ever.
There’s, the word “mentor “can better describe the roles than assistant and partner!

Some of the reasons for changing the name of the LLM systems from “assistant “to “mentor “in the coming year are:

– Key Features of 2025 LLMs

1- Emotional understanding

In 2024, language models were based on text clues and tones, while in 2025, it seems that multi-analysis including text, audio, video, or even deeper emotional impressions will be possible.

2- Feedback style

In 2024, responses were “reactive “and based on immediate inputs and seemed to lack thought and cognition. In the coming year, feedback from large language models can be advanced and progressive and strengthen the development of the emotional intelligence of users. In other words, they will be more “reflective “rather than reactive.

3- Context awareness

You, as a user of LLM, have experienced that when you ask for specific information about an article or a researcher, it gives you a specific answer and this answer may not even be durable. That is, when you ask the same question again, it gives you a different answer. This indicates shallow and non-durable information. In next year’s language models, it is expected that the level and duration of the requested information will be slightly longer and that users will be given coherent information based on previous information history.

4- Role in Empathy

As mentioned earlier, large language models were passive information partners that provided predefined scenarios to users and applicants. The terms “partner” and “assistant” have been used many times to describe their role.
For example, sometimes ask them for information that we do not currently have and that we urgently need to perform a specific function. LLMs remind us of the answer in the fastest time from the information store and our “puzzle “is solved because a piece of the puzzle was not available in our short-term memory and we probably found that piece and solved the puzzle with the help of our super-advanced partner.

On the other hand, this process can be even more advanced, meaning that instead of passively calling out a predefined answer, a response based on the user’s emotional state and feelings is issued.

This is empathy because it can transform the role of the AI from a passive assistant who only calls out the missing link in the puzzle and solves the puzzle to the role of a “mentor” who guides the user towards the goal with empathy and emotional support.

5- Collaboration-based connection

Probably you have also had the experience of using AI tools to perform or complete a task such as composing a piece of music, writing a letter or a targeted request, or designing a specific decoration. It quickly answers each of your questions and at the end asks whether the information it has provided in this way was sufficient or not. If you ask for more information again, it will still be responsive like a hardworking and tireless assistant. If it does not know enough about your question or request, it will respond with an apology.

This is a collaborative approach to LLM systems. But recently, significant advances in AI systems promise new changes.

Therefore, it is possible and predictable that in the next few months, for example, request for help to complete a project, it will not only guide you to the end of the task but also witness the system’s effort to bond and cultivate long-term collaboration and build trust in you. This effort to encourage the user is evidence of the change in the position of artificial intelligence from “assistant” to “mentor”.
You are right, “the interaction between humans – and technology is becoming easier because this collaboration will change from a dry and reactive to a reflective state. Therefore, what started in the last months of 2024 will gain strength in 2025.

7- Application Areas

As mentioned above, the major industries that applied AI last year are healthcare, education, finance, and customer service. Among these, education and healthcare were and are ranked first. However, as users’ knowledge expands and AI’s capabilities increase in guiding personal and professional performance, it seems that more industries will accept the dominance of AI and apply these technologies as non-human assistants and even mentors.

Conclusion

Last year, the world of technology faced rapid developments in artificial intelligence systems, so that LLMs were nicknamed “human assistants” in many industries. Considering the developments of the last months and days of 2024, it is not far-fetched the majority of companies will accept applying these technologies, and even AI will become a “mentor” in the context of LLM. This mentor doesn’t mean to replace humans, but rather an intellectual technology that responds to users’ requests and can dynamically guide their performance.

This guidance seems to rely on two-way collaboration, emotional elements, and other components mentioned in the article. Undoubtedly, these are all personal predictions that have arisen from studying past trends and logic, and we need to see what will happen in the first months of 2025.

The post The Leap of AI-Human Interaction in the Context of LLM: Comparing 2025 with 2024 appeared first on Medika Life.

One of the most troubling consequences of whataboutism is the erosion of empathy. In our rush to defend positions or deflect criticism, we overlook the human component of issues. Instances of social injustice, environmental degradation, and economic inequality represent real struggles real people face. Yet, in the age of whataboutism, empathy has become a casualty of our ideological battles.

What lies beneath this behavioral phenomenon, and what does it say about our capacity to understand or respect one another? Expressing concern for any specific community can now offend supporters of another community and become a trap that suppresses authentic empathy. Whataboutism steers us toward making sure not to offend anyone; it forces us to try and avoid barbs rather than productively discuss a specific, time-pressing, painful issue. The result is that we stay silent rather than speak to one particular person’s needs or community’s plight.

In a world in which urgent communication increasingly informs the tone and tempo of our discourse, when knee-jerk responses encouraged by social media cascade in response to the expression of concern for one community’s difficulties, someone is bound to be outraged and outspoken about it if we fail to acknowledge in tandem the predicament of others. This kind of blowback is all but guaranteed when a business, community or spiritual leader voices that concern. In that case, the wrath of the “X bots” is unleashed. The fear of whataboutism eventually gives birth to siloed tribalism and the fear of saying anything.

Conversation Without Substance

Whataboutism operates on the premise that rather than address a specific issue; our focus should be more expansive — more inclusive.

The problem is that our concern and empathy become diluted and ineffectual. Politicians, in particular, often structure their comments as all-encompassing during debates, speeches, and community visits. Instead of engaging with the substance and acknowledging the validity of a specific concern, whataboutism is deployed as a diversionary tactic to steer the conversation away from the main point.

Suppose you support Black Lives Matter because deadly violence, economic disparities, and well-documented health inequities disproportionately threaten Black Americans. In the wake of the George Floyd murder and protests, responses driven by whataboutism (e.g., “all lives matter”) expressed points of view that would be valid at any other time but, in that specific moment, seemed designed to undermine empathy.

This is equally true of concerns for people suffering outside our communities; however, in the face of an unfolding crisis, expressing concern for ALL people does away with our ability to express empathy or solidarity for any one people. This “all or nothing” mentality also diminishes our ability to feel empathy or solidarity for more than one group.

Can Two “Rights” Occupy the Same Brain Space?

The human mind’s multitasking capacity has limits. But when multimedia — particularly social media — accelerates the flood of information, it diminishes our mind’s analytic ability to move from thought to thought and task to task. This cognitive muscle, termed “parallel processing,” enables individuals to connect varied mental tasks and concepts concurrently. However, how we effectively juggle multiple thoughts simultaneously and consecutively is complex — it’s a gift for some and an impossible struggle for others.

The brain’s architecture paves the way for parallel processing. Different regions of the brain specialize in distinct cognitive functions. Neurologically, the prefrontal cortex handles executive functions like decision-making, while the hippocampus is dedicated to memory.

When two topics don’t heavily overlap in brain regions, it’s easier to think about them in tandem — brain function that employs diverse and expansive thinking is where the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus co-exist harmoniously.

At its core, whataboutism plays psychological games and forces communicators to avoid topical minefields and speak to all points of view at all times or be called out, requiring them to either dig in their heels or acquiesce and admit error.

“Can I express my concern for you alone at this moment? Or, must I write about your suffering or tragedy incompletely so that others feel their struggle is not ignored?”

That has become a unique challenge in a fast-moving information world where partisan politics and tribalism exert outsized influence.

Tribalism Over Empathy

Whataboutism reveals our deep biases and tribal/national instincts. We tend to passionately defend our beliefs and affiliations too often at the expense of understanding the pain and suffering of others. An “us versus them” tribal mentality, in which empathy is reserved only for those within our religion, region or race, calls on us to view outsiders with suspicion or disdain.

The rise of whataboutism coincides with the information overload of the digital age. With a constant stream of news, social media updates, and opinions competing for our attention, it is easy to become overwhelmed. Issues are often reduced to soundbites or headlines, devoid of the depth and nuance they demand. As a result, our ability to understand situations becomes diluted by the sheer volume of competing narratives vying for our attention.

Expressing a Dual Narrative

Whataboutism perpetuates a false equivalency between issues, suggesting that addressing one issue somehow negates the importance of another. This binary thinking fails to recognize the interconnectedness of social problems and the need for multifaceted solutions. Reducing complex issues to simplistic comparisons, whataboutism undermines meaningful dialogue and halts progress.

How do we counteract the effects of whataboutism and reclaim our humanity for continuous dialogue and empathy?

We must cultivate a culture of diversity and inclusion. That will help to lessen the knee-jerk tendency of rejecting the concerns of others. We must foster open-mindedness and acknowledge our biases, blind spots, and areas for psychological growth. This requires a willingness to engage in an uncomfortable conversation, which is essential to feeling genuine empathy and reaching an understanding.

We must resist the temptation to engage in whataboutism ourselves. We should address issues humbly and honestly instead of deflecting criticism or derailing conversations. This means listening actively to others’ perspectives, acknowledging their concerns, and seeking common ground wherever possible. Stephen R. Covey wrote that it calls for patience; “first seek to understand and then be understood.”

Feeling empathy cannot become a lost skill. It is one of the things that makes us human. It means putting ourselves in others’ shoes, even if only for a moment, recognizing their humanity and the validity of their experience. Empathy requires us to move beyond a singular perspective and recognize every individual’s inherent worth and dignity, regardless of their background or beliefs. It does not require us to embrace their ideas or ideals.

We must recover the discipline to sit quietly, listen, and learn to do this. That’s the basis of becoming critical thinkers and skilled communicators who can separate fact from fiction and recognize the manipulative tactics of whataboutism when we encounter them in a world awash with rapid information. By staying informed, questioning assumptions, and actively seeking diverse perspectives, we can immunize our discourse against the polarizing effects of whataboutism and work toward a more compassionate and inclusive society.

The magnitude of misinformation, disinformation, and whataboutism is troubling in our democratic societies, which encourage open discourse. In recognizing the psychological roots of whataboutism and working to neutralize its effects, we may be able to preserve our human capacity for empathy and engage in more meaningful dialogue on the issues that matter at specific moments. We can create space to listen and grow emotionally and organizationally. It’s time to move beyond the distractions of whataboutism toward a more engaged and empathetic world.

The post Is “Whataboutism” Killing Empathy? appeared first on Medika Life.

The deaths of small children do not move us beyond tears and platitudes to policy action. What will? We are lost if we don’t demand a significant change in gun access policy after reading how a two-year-old wandered lost and frightened after both parents were shot and killed. After people going food shopping in Buffalo were slain. After people going to relax at a club in Colorado Springs were brutally murdered. How about the deaths at Walmart in Chesapeake, Virginia? Empathy drained. Courageous political action is tossed aside for preferred partisan politics.

Past policies passed in the bi-partisan Senate move are weak compromises.  They are face-saving actions for both major parties, not life-sparing policy moves that will reduce the death toll from gun violence. We need to make a move that will save lives, requiring a complete ban on automatic weapons. The Senate’s bipartisan gun deal includes additional mental health funding, increased school safety, more crisis intervention programs, and incentives for states to align juvenile records in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. But automatic, high-powered velocity weapons – weapons of war – continue to be accessible.

High-Powered Weapon Purchases Are Climbing

In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed an assault-weapons ban, which resulted in the reduction of the AR-15 and similar semiautomatic rifles sales. The Ban only covered a 10-year window, in which mass shootings were down dramatically. When the assault-weapons ban expired 10 years later, gun manufacturers filled the production pipeline and sales rose. Recently – and tragically – the AR-15 has been at the scene of almost every mass shooting to hit the headlines in recent years. It’s design – the spin of the bullet – and firepower make killing as easy as pressing the trigger again and again until its 30-bullet magazine is spent.

The United States is witnessing a record year of gun violence – more than 600 mass shootings in 2022. The pressure is on lawmakers to enact meaningful reforms. But, little action is expected to curb this continued slaughter of the innocent.

Weapons of War are Designed for One Purpose – to Kill

For six years as a military paratrooper and combat medic, I carried an M-4, the preferred weapon of war for infantry entering combat.  The M-4 is a smaller, more convenient version of the M-16.  These are the weapons of war used in past mass shootings.  Some express misguided comfort that the A-15 is semi-auto only, and the M16 is fully automatic. But in combat situations, soldiers rarely fire on automatic. Few do, for every bullet counts.  Let’s stop calling these rifles “automatic.”  They are weapons created for war – weapons of war to wound and kill others.

Civilians are the Victims of this Gun-Epidemic War

We must heed the words of the onsite physician first responder in Highland Park, Dr. David Baum: 

“The people who were (killed) were blown up by that gunfire … blown up. The horrific scene of some bodies is unspeakable for the average person. I’ve never served, but those are wartime injuries. Those are what are seen in victims of war, not victims at a parade.”

Dr. Roy Guerrero, a healer of children who rushed to Uvalde Memorial Hospital after the massacre of 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Texas, testified during a congressional hearing on gun violence:

“I chose to be a pediatrician. I chose to take care of children. “Keeping them safe from preventable diseases I can do. Keeping them safe from bacteria and brittle bones, I can do. But making sure our children are safe from guns, that’s the job of our politicians and leaders.”

The words of Drs Baum and Guerrero echo a simple truth: our politicians are too removed from the steady death toll and its horror to fulfill their responsibilities in protecting the nation. America is at war within itself. Our political leaders decline to call for a ceasefire despite rising body count.  Let’s call these weapons what they are – weapons of war. 

The AR-15-styled weapon was used in the Sandy Hook massacre, the Aurora theater massacre, the San Bernardino massacre, Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, FL, mass murder in Buffalo, NY, Uvalde, Texas, Highland Park, IL and the most recent shootings. What’s the difference between the AR-15 and its military counterpart, the M16?  They are assault weapons that hold a 30-bullet magazine and offer users the same firepower. Their killing capacity, like their power, is equal.

Congress must hold some responsibility for the murders around the nation. If its members cannot agree to protect the nation’s youngest citizens who sit in classrooms eager to learn to read, count, and play team sports, then they can either sharpen their empathy skills and feel people’s pain or consider their time in public office as a failure.

Congress Must See the Wounds of the Dead and Suffering

How can Congress show a higher degree of responsibility – a heightened connection to people’s enduring pain – physical and psychological?  Look and remember!  Each day, they should begin their sessions looking at the actual photos of those shot – the wounded and killed.  They should learn about their injuries, urgent care, and rehabilitation.  Also, each purchase of an AR-15 should require liability insurance.  Where there is no economic impact, death becomes cheap. For almost certain, once insurance companies are paying out claims, something is likely to change.

With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the US has almost 50 percent of the world’s civilian-owned guns. The US ranks number one in firearms per capita. Our nation also has the highest homicide-by-firearm rate among the world’s most developed nations. Forget the reasons used to explain-away mass shootings; at the scene of each of these horrific acts are often weapons of war.

Americans need patriotic public service advocates in Washington, DC, who place the survival of its citizens at the forefront of their efforts.  Weapons of war, such as AR-15s, have no place in people’s home arsenals. Its bullet’s caliber rips its target apart – going in small and exiting the size of a fist. Members of Congress and their staff must be required – regardless of their political party affiliation– to see the destructive path of an AR-15 caliber bullet after every mass shooting – see the faces and hear the screams of the families impacted until those cries echo in their heads.  They must identify with the continued horror the first responders will likely experience for years.

Years after my military service, I remember the faces of the wounded and dead. I remember stemming blood from their gunshot wounds.  I hear their voices calling for distant mothers or asking if they will die. What was training and instinct – the ability to separate from the swirl around me and perform under fire – now is a movie reel that plays in my head. 

I cherish life, my role as a healer, and now, my responsibilities as a health communicator. But each moment in harm’s way was never about policy; it was about survival. Now, we are all in harm’s way wherever we go. Congress, you must transcend your political differences and imagine the cries of children murdered, calling hopelessly beforehand for their parents unable to reach out. Ban assault weapons. Ban weapons of war.

[This post was originally published on July 22nd and has now been updated to reflect the recent shootings the continued lack of Federal government action to guard its citizens’ safety.]

The post If Deaths of Small Children Do Not Move Us to Action What Will? appeared first on Medika Life.

• mind-body healing, or
• a particular doctor or therapist’s approach, or
• a book, or
• an idea

…that you’ll be rewarded for your belief by magically healing.⁠
⁠
But that’s not how it works, in my opinion.⁠
⁠
Healing is about believing in yourself — your capability and your worthiness.⁠
⁠
When you believe in yourself, you don’t see flare-ups as failures — so you keep going.⁠
⁠
When you believe in yourself, you don’t give yourself ultimatums — so you respect the pace of your healing.⁠
⁠
When you believe in your capability and worthiness, your belief is unconditional — so you don’t withhold belief while waiting for “proof.”⁠
⁠
When you believe in yourself, you don’t abandon yourself — so you stick with yourself no matter what.⁠
⁠
When you believe in yourself, you don’t put pressure on yourself — so your nervous system is allowed to recover from being over-stressed.⁠
⁠
When you decide to believe in yourself, you commit to loving yourself unconditionally — and that’s the greatest healing of all.⁠
⁠
Self-love paves the way to healing, not the other way around.

With mountains of love, encouragement and belief in you,

💖 Anna

The post Belief Is Key to Healing — But Not How You Might Think appeared first on Medika Life.

But it’s not the expansion that causes the symptoms. It’s the tension that happens when fear rushes in to constrict the expansion. Because expanding into new and unknown levels of your life energy can be scary! Especially if you’ve been taught all your life to stay small or to fear “failure.”⁠

When flare-ups happen in the midst of a life-expanding experience, our impulse may be to step back: Maybe if we quit the job, decline the award, break up with our new love, delay the new business — maybe then the symptoms will subside.⁠

But when we do this — when we make our life smaller — our passionate life energy becomes more and more suppressed and constricted. The tension grows more intense. The symptoms are prolonged and they take over more and more of our life.⁠

Instead of trying to dampen our life energy, what if we instead turned toward the fear that is constricting it? What if we offered the fear these three ingredients of healing:⁠ Acknowledgment, empathy + love.⁠

With time, patience and consistency, those healing ingredients will eventually soften the fear. We may need extra time and rest to ease our fear, but that does not mean we’re shutting down our life and our passions. Because when fear begins to loosen its grip around our life energy, our energy begins to flow again, and life begins to feel a whole lot better.⁠

With love, empathy and encouragement — cheering for you,

💖 Anna

The post You Don’t Have to Quit Your Passion to Heal From Chronic Pain appeared first on Medika Life.

Throughout the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Burt remained engaged with students and colleagues. He taught by Zoom and held a Springfield College ID that was current through the last year of his life.  When a department colleague mentioned their impending retirement, My father-in-law at age 97, said he might retire in May 2022. Although Burt did not make it to his target retirement date, he dedicated much of his life to enjoying close relationships with his students – future therapists dedicated to supporting competitive athletes to achieve their fullest potential. 

Among Burt’s papers, this typed note to his graduate students was found focusing on “self-care.” Burt, a dual-board certified internist (infectious disease specialist) and psychiatrist, author and gifted speaker, was interested in why illness – mental or physical – exists and how people can intervene to prevent despair and disease.  Here are his wise words left to us:

Self-Care

“Graduate students have many calls for their attention and energy.  When self-care is viewed as an alternative to working, a dichotomy is created that presents the dilemma.  ‘Either I attend to myself or I attend to work.”  If the concept of self-care were broadened to include devoting my energy to attend to all my needs, wants, thoughts and feelings, the either/or dilemma might recede.

“Here’s how that would work:

“in my daily life, it is important to me to take care of my physical needs (exercise, nutrition, relaxation), psychological needs (self-worth, self-acceptance, autonomy, etc.), and social needs (relationships).  It is also important to me to have enjoyment and fun, as well as to feel good about myself and satisfied with the work that I do.

“When I devote time and effort to any of these elements, it counts as taking care of myself. Therefore, when I decide to work, I am taking care of myself by feeling the satisfaction of work well done.

“How much time and energy are devoted to each element is a decision that will vary with the circumstances.  Choosing an activity that is fun is not self-sacrificing the quality of work; it is attending to another need.  Allowing your choice to attend to any of the needs or wants is an important aspect of healthy adjustment.  It does require a non-judgmental perspective to enable free movement from one choice to the next.

“So my advice to students is to include them all.  Then, all you need to do is decide how much of each is enough for now.”

(signed) Burt Giges

The post “Self-Care” – Wisdom Discovered Among the Papers of a Beloved Parent appeared first on Medika Life.